There are some cases where generosity can be a good thing though. Machiavelli says, "if he is wise he ought not to fear the reputation of being mean, for in time he will come to be more considered than if liberal, seeing that with his economy his revenues are enough, that he can defend himself against all attacks, and is able to engage in enterprises without burdening his people; thus it comes to pass that he exercises liberality towards all from whom he does not take, who are numberless, and meanness towards those to whom he does not give, who are few." (Ch. 16) Machiavelli is saying that at first a prince would need to be frugal, saving money, so that once there is extra money saved up he can use it for generous deeds. Machiavelli also says that it is good to be generous when working to become a prince. For example, Caesar obtained his empire by being generous, but if he had lived and not controlled his spending then he would've caused the downfall of his empire.
Machiavelli basically says generosity can hurt a prince if the prince is unwise, but it can also be good if the prince knows how to control it. It is more important for the prince to keep his power by being a bit mean than it is for him to be generous and loved. Being generous is a good thing, but only when it is given wisely.
Works Cited:
Machiavelli, N. (1532). The Prince. Florence: Antonio Blado d'Asola. .
Works Cited:
Machiavelli, N. (1532). The Prince. Florence: Antonio Blado d'Asola. .
Construct an argument that pulls more broadly from the book; don't think about things limited to a single example regarding Caesar. Think about how his examples of Borgia, et al, portray different versions of generosity or the opposite and construe what Mac is trying to say by giving these examples.
ReplyDelete