Outline:
- Pessimistic Enlightenment ideas and optimistic Pre-Enlightenment ideas
- Leibniz was a German philosopher who believed in the optimistic Pre-Enlightenment idea that because God created the world and God is perfect, anything that happens in the world is the best thing that could possibly happen.
- Pangloss represents Leibniz's views.
- Voltaire, the author of Candide, argues against this idea in Candide by using satire to show his pessimistic Enlightenment beliefs.
- Martin represents Voltaire's views.
- Pangloss has an optimistic belief, which is quixotic and not possible.
- He teaches Candide that nothing can be bad in the world because God created it and God is perfect.
- Candide suffers many awful things.
- In chapter 2 Candide is whipped brutally by the Bulgars.
- He still believes in Pangloss's optimism though.
- In chapter 19 Candide meets a slave who is missing a leg and a hand.
- It is at this point that Candide renounces Pangloss's optimism because he sees how unequal and cruel the world really is.
- Martin has a realistic approach to life.
- Martin acknowledges that there are bad things in the world.
- He believes that the world is imperfect.
- He has a pessimistic and realistic view of life.
- He helps to change Candide's view of the world.
- In Chapter 20 the ship of the captain who took Candide's money sinks and the captain and crew drown
- Candide is happy about this and says that there is some good in the world.
- Martin argues saying, "but did the passengers aboard his ship have to perish too?"
- In Chapter 24 Candide starts to agree with Martin after losing money to a valet and not being able to find Cacambo or Cunegonde.
- Conclusion
- Pangloss had an optimistic and unrealistic view of the world.
- Martin's view of the world was more realistic and it showed the world for how it truly is.
- Candide learns that Pangloss's belief was wrong and even Pangloss does too.
Overall, nice outline. I would like to see you define "unrealistic" (as compared to?)
ReplyDelete